I have been studying the traits and dispositions of the lower animals (so-called), and contrasting them with the traits and dispositions of man.I find the result humiliating to me. For it obliges me to renounce my allegiance to the Darwinian theory of the Ascent of Man from the Lower Animals; since it now seems plain to me that the theory ought to be vacated in favor of a new and truer one, this new and truer one to be named the Descent of Man from the Higher Animals.
Oh how right you are, Mr. Twain.
Today in English Class Ms. Silcott had us read “The Lowest Animal” by Mark Twain. Never before have I agreed with an essay more. His tasteful use of satire keeps you interested and his spectrum sized vocabulary has you gripping at the dictionary, urging you to read more, to not only finish, but comprehend. I think, perhaps, Mr. Mark Twain (or Samuel Langhorn Clemens) is one of the most intelligent, respectable men of our 19th century.
However, not to criticize Mr. Twain but his satire is flawed when he mentions a Chinese Buddhist:
… a Buddhist from China; a Brahman from Benares. Finally, a Salvation Army Colonel from Wapping. Then I stayed away two whole days.When I came back to note results, the cage of Higher Animals was all right, but in the other there was but a chaos of gory odds and ends of turbans and fezzes and plaids and bones and flesh not a specimen left alive.These Reasoning Animals had disagreed on a theological detail and carried the matter to a Higher Court.
Just a handy tidbit: a Buddhist wouldn’t argue. He’d probably just chill and meditate.
I’m sure you all watched the Olympics, and if you didn’t… SHAME ON YOU.